The full application

Embodiment 04 · Prior-Art Review in Drafting

The draft that did its reading.

Inside the automated drafting pipeline, prior-art review is a first-class stage — not an afterthought. Before any specification section is written, the pipeline searches patent corpora, judges each candidate’s threat to your novelty, and selects the references your draft must be written against.

THE ART, REVIEWED FIRSTUS 10,842CITEEP 3,301CITEWO 19/144REMOTEBACKGROUNDUS 10,842 — DISTINGUISHEDEP 3,301 — DISTINGUISHEDDRAFTED AGAINST THE ART — BEFORE SECTION ONEAUDIT
Fig. E4Prior-Art Review in Drafting

5

threat verdicts per reference

0.3

relevance floor — below it, excluded

100%

of automated drafts run the review

The method

  1. 01

    Claims frozen first

    Your claim set is generated and frozen before the review — so the review measures references against a fixed target instead of a moving one.

  2. 02

    Corpus-first search

    The stage searches curated international, European, and Indian patent corpora first, widening to global patent collections when the primaries come up empty.

  3. 03

    A verdict for every candidate

    Each reference is scored for relevance and given a novelty-threat verdict — anticipates, obvious, adjacent, remote, unknown — along with which parts matter and which of your features it does not disclose.

  4. 04

    Selected, excluded, audited

    Strong references are auto-selected; remote, unknown, and low-relevance candidates are excluded. The whole pass is recorded as an audit — counts, providers, fallbacks, exclusions.

  5. 05

    Drafted against the art

    Selected references flow into the drafting configuration, so the background and description are written aware of — and differentiated from — the closest art.

Wherein, notably

By the time the first section is written, the draft has already read the art it must be different from.

Wherein

Automatic, not optional

In the automated pipeline the review always runs (unless you supply your own art and say “use only mine”). Prior-art awareness is the default, not an upsell.

Conservative on purpose

Verdicts are made from title and abstract only, and uncertainty forces “unknown” — the pipeline would rather exclude a reference than invent a reading of it.

Manual art respected

References you provide are saved first and merged with the automatic pass — your knowledge of the field is never overwritten.

Shared infrastructure

The same corpus providers and threat vocabulary as the full novelty pipeline — one retrieval stack, one language of risk, end to end.

See it on your own invention.

Start a draft that does its reading

Start your application

Free to start · No credit card required